|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
Data corrente: |
08/09/2023 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/09/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
SILVA, R. F. B. da; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; VIÑA, A.; DOU, Y.; MORAN, E.; BATISTELLA, M.; LAPOLA, D. M.; LIU, J. |
Afiliação: |
RAMON FELIPE BICUDO DA SILVA, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; JAMES D. A. MILLINGTON, KING’S COLLEGE LONDON; ANDRÉS VIÑA, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA; YUE DOU, UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE; EMILIO MORAN, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; MATEUS BATISTELLA, CNPTIA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; DAVID M. LAPOLA, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; JIANGUO LIU, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. |
Título: |
Balancing food production with climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon. |
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Science of The Total Environment, v. 904, 166681, Dec. 2023. |
ISSN: |
0048-9697 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166681 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract. Climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation are two major environmental actions that need to be effectively performed this century, alongside ensuring food supply for a growing global human population. These three issues are highly interlinked through land management systems. Thus, major global food production regions located in biodiversity hotpots and with potential for carbon sequestration face trade-offs between these valuable land-based ecosystem services. The state of Mato Grosso in Brazil is one such region, where private lands that have been illegally used for agriculture could be restored to natural vegetation - with potential benefits for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation, although with potentially negative effects on food production. To address this challenge, in this study we used a multicriteria nexus modeling approach that considers carbon stocks, priority areas for biodiversity conservation, and the opportunity for food production, to develop scenarios of land allocation that aim to balance the benefits and drawbacks of ecosystem restoration. Results show that forcing landowners to restore their individual lands compromises the potential for a "green land market" throughout the Amazon biome in which private landowners with lower food production capacities (e.g., less connected to markets and infrastructure) would benefit from restoration programs that compensate them for the inclusion of environmental restoration among their economic activities, instead of taking large economic risks to produce more food. We additionally highlight that strategic ecosystem restoration can achieve higher gains in biodiversity and carbon with lower costs of restoration actions and with minimal impacts on agriculture. Analyses like ours demonstrate how scenarios of land allocation that simultaneously address climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation through ecosystem restoration, while also minimizing possible impacts on food production, can be sought to move the world towards a sustainable future. MenosAbstract. Climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation are two major environmental actions that need to be effectively performed this century, alongside ensuring food supply for a growing global human population. These three issues are highly interlinked through land management systems. Thus, major global food production regions located in biodiversity hotpots and with potential for carbon sequestration face trade-offs between these valuable land-based ecosystem services. The state of Mato Grosso in Brazil is one such region, where private lands that have been illegally used for agriculture could be restored to natural vegetation - with potential benefits for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation, although with potentially negative effects on food production. To address this challenge, in this study we used a multicriteria nexus modeling approach that considers carbon stocks, priority areas for biodiversity conservation, and the opportunity for food production, to develop scenarios of land allocation that aim to balance the benefits and drawbacks of ecosystem restoration. Results show that forcing landowners to restore their individual lands compromises the potential for a "green land market" throughout the Amazon biome in which private landowners with lower food production capacities (e.g., less connected to markets and infrastructure) would benefit from restoration programs that compensate them for the inclusion of environmental restoration amo... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Bioma Amazônia; Conservação da biodiversidade; Mitigação de mudanças climáticas; Sequestro de carbono. |
Thesagro: |
Produção de Alimentos. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biodiversity; Carbon sequestration; Climate change; Food production. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 03133naa a2200337 a 4500 001 2156523 005 2023-09-08 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0048-9697 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166681$2DOI 100 1 $aSILVA, R. F. B. da 245 $aBalancing food production with climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 520 $aAbstract. Climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation are two major environmental actions that need to be effectively performed this century, alongside ensuring food supply for a growing global human population. These three issues are highly interlinked through land management systems. Thus, major global food production regions located in biodiversity hotpots and with potential for carbon sequestration face trade-offs between these valuable land-based ecosystem services. The state of Mato Grosso in Brazil is one such region, where private lands that have been illegally used for agriculture could be restored to natural vegetation - with potential benefits for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation, although with potentially negative effects on food production. To address this challenge, in this study we used a multicriteria nexus modeling approach that considers carbon stocks, priority areas for biodiversity conservation, and the opportunity for food production, to develop scenarios of land allocation that aim to balance the benefits and drawbacks of ecosystem restoration. Results show that forcing landowners to restore their individual lands compromises the potential for a "green land market" throughout the Amazon biome in which private landowners with lower food production capacities (e.g., less connected to markets and infrastructure) would benefit from restoration programs that compensate them for the inclusion of environmental restoration among their economic activities, instead of taking large economic risks to produce more food. We additionally highlight that strategic ecosystem restoration can achieve higher gains in biodiversity and carbon with lower costs of restoration actions and with minimal impacts on agriculture. Analyses like ours demonstrate how scenarios of land allocation that simultaneously address climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation through ecosystem restoration, while also minimizing possible impacts on food production, can be sought to move the world towards a sustainable future. 650 $aBiodiversity 650 $aCarbon sequestration 650 $aClimate change 650 $aFood production 650 $aProdução de Alimentos 653 $aBioma Amazônia 653 $aConservação da biodiversidade 653 $aMitigação de mudanças climáticas 653 $aSequestro de carbono 700 1 $aMILLINGTON, J. D. A. 700 1 $aVIÑA, A. 700 1 $aDOU, Y. 700 1 $aMORAN, E. 700 1 $aBATISTELLA, M. 700 1 $aLAPOLA, D. M. 700 1 $aLIU, J. 773 $tScience of The Total Environment$gv. 904, 166681, Dec. 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
Data corrente: |
20/02/2006 |
Data da última atualização: |
05/06/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, C. A. P.; DUARTE, M. de L. R.; KONAGANO, M.; HIDAKA, G. S. |
Afiliação: |
CELIO ARMANDO PALHETA FERREIRA, CPATU; MARIA DE LOURDES REIS DUARTE, CPATU; MICHINORI KONAGANO, CAMTA; GERMANO SETSUO HIDAKA, ASFATA. |
Título: |
Coeficientes técnicos, custos, rendimentos e rentabilidade. |
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: DUARTE, M. de L. R. Cultivo da pimenteira-do-reino na Região Norte. Belém, PA: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, 2004. |
Páginas: |
p. 157-167. |
Série: |
(Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Sistemas de produção, 1). |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Coeficiente técnico; Pimenta-do-reino. |
Thesagro: |
Custo; Rendimento; Rentabilidade. |
Categoria do assunto: |
E Economia e Indústria Agrícola |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/160542/1/SP1-Coeficientes.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00735naa a2200229 a 4500 001 1407762 005 2017-06-05 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aFERREIRA, C. A. P. 245 $aCoeficientes técnicos, custos, rendimentos e rentabilidade. 260 $c2004 300 $ap. 157-167. 490 $a(Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Sistemas de produção, 1). 650 $aCusto 650 $aRendimento 650 $aRentabilidade 653 $aCoeficiente técnico 653 $aPimenta-do-reino 700 1 $aDUARTE, M. de L. R. 700 1 $aKONAGANO, M. 700 1 $aHIDAKA, G. S. 773 $tIn: DUARTE, M. de L. R. Cultivo da pimenteira-do-reino na Região Norte. Belém, PA: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, 2004.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|